Keynesian And World Stimuli
Has Keynesian economics been proven to be an illusion? It holds that government spending has a 'multiplier effect' that has justified spending public money--even when the government doesn't have it. Now it appears the 'multiplier' is a mirage.
Bookmark and Share

 

Today's G-20 meeting has been advertised as a showdown between the U.S. and Europe over more spending "stimulus," and so it is. But the larger story is the end of the neo-Keynesian economic moment, and perhaps the start of a healthier policy turn.

For going on three years, the developed world's economic policy has been dominated by the revival of the old idea that vast amounts of public spending could prevent deflation, cure a recession, and ignite a new era of government-led prosperity. It hasn't turned out that way.

Now the political and fiscal bills are coming due even as the U.S. and European economies are merely muddling along. The Europeans have had enough and want to swear off the sauce, while the Obama Administration wants to keep running a bar tab. So this would seem to be a good time to examine recent policy history and assess the results. More here.

What Can You Do?
We're working to bring the financial truth to the elections, and we need your help!

 
Sign up today for e-letter updates and information on how you can get involved in Truth in Accounting.
Where does your presidential candidate stand?
 
Home | About | Facts | News | Videos | Blog | Contact | Donate | Privacy Policy

© 2008 TRUTH IN ACCOUNTING

Nology Interactive - Web Design - Hosting - IT Services